Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 1.15.55 PM

In a move that Governor Mike Pence admits he had not anticipated, the McDonald’s restaurant chain announced today that they will no longer serve Christians in their Indiana locations. McDonald’s spokesman Ron McDee made the announcement from a drive-through window at the Gary, Indiana McDonald’s restaurant. “We haven’t quite figured out how we will be able to tell if they are Christians or not, but you can bet your sweet Jesus that we will be asking every guest if thy have been saved from this day on” McDee stated.

The move by McDonald’s is the first of its kind in the days following Gov. Pence’s signing of The Religious Freedom Restoration Act last week. While originally designed to provide legal protection for discrimination against the LGBT community, the new law will allow for many new forms of discrimination throughout the “Honest-to-Goodness” state.

Other business are seeing the profit potential in the new legislation. Indiana Walmart executives have apparently been discussing ways to benefit from the new law, with “We’ll Take Your Gay Money” promotional materials recently being leaked by an inside source on Instagram.

McDee indicated that “everything was on the table.” McDonald’s original plan was to just eliminate the popular “Filet o’ Fish” sandwich, which the franchise sells to Christians avoiding the meat of warm-blooded animals during their holy season of Lent.

McDonald’s corporate offices in Oak Brook, IL would not return our calls, but a representative from Walmart who requested anonymity was quoted as saying, “Hells yeah! We got this!”

What Really Caused GoDaddy’s Outage?

Posted: September 12, 2012 in Tech Life

Image

Since GoDaddy has publicly denied that an outside agent was the cause of their network collapse on September 10th, there has been much speculation on what “a series of internal network events that corrupted router data tables” might actually mean. While there are several theories on what really happened, I’ve gotta believe it was a Linksys router needing to be reset. Happens to me all the time.

Instagram

Posted: August 23, 2012 in Facebook, Social Media, Tech Life

Image

What do you think of the new design? Does it look vaguely familiar to you?

Image

T-Mobile has launched a new ad campaign on Facebook. At first glance it appears to feature an old phone with a badly cracked screen. To make matters worse, the photo of the Samsung Galaxy S III smartphone with the dandelion/shattered screen came from a Samsung photo shoot. This means that two different marketing departments thought this looked ok! Even if you don’t see a smashed screen when you look at it, how do you really feel about dandelions? Probably not the best way to illustrate the Galaxy S III’s sharing capabilities.

I wonder if the team who designed this campaign still works for T-Mobile? Perhaps they never did . . .

Some of their Facebook fans had the same reaction:

Image

If you hadn’t yet noticed, Facebook made a pretty significant change to your Facebook page this week and it might make you a little bit upset!

If you had an email address listed in the “About” section of your timeline, it no longer is displayed. Nope, Facebook decided that you would rather use your Facebook email address. (Cue the guy muttering something under his breath about not even having a Facebook email account). Ahh, but you do! Facebook gave it to you one night while you were sleeping!

Now don’t worry, you can change it back to your preferred email address. It’s still there. I will guide you through the simple process in a moment.

The question is: “Why?” What does Facebook stand to gain by doing this and risking ticking off most, if not all, of its 900+ million users? As Facebook continues to wipe the egg off of its red face in the aftermath of its ill-fated IPO, you would think that the directive from the new Board of Directors would be, “Let’s not do anything stupid . . . not yet.”

But Facebook has always preferred asking for forgiveness over asking for permission. Besides, this is reversible . . . where’s the real harm? Not unlike bullies on a school bus, Facebook continues to taunt and do as they please, taking a “We’re f’ing Facebook . . . deal with it” attitude. I can’t help but think that the public will eventually have had enough. I just don’t see any signs of that yet.

How to switch back to your old email

  • Go to your Timeline (your name, not “Home” in the top right of your screen)
  • Below your small profile picture, click on “About”
  • Under “Contact Info” heading, click on “Edit”
  • You will see a list of all emails associated with your account. The new Facebook email account will be the only active account (grey circle, no slash).
  • Click on the grey circle to the right of the Facebook email account
  • Click on “Hidden from Timeline”
  • Do the same for any email addresses you want Public by clicking on the circle to the right of it and clicking “Shown of Timeline”
  • Once you are satisfied with the setup, scroll to the bottom of the box and click “Save”

That’s all there is to it! Now scratch your head like I am doing . . .

I was at home tonight, enjoying the rumbles and flashes of the first thunderstorm (on the eve) of Spring, when I received a text message. I reluctantly pulled my phone out of my pocket, fully expecting it to be one of my kids asking me to come and help them change a tire in the downpour. Much to my relief, it was just an innocuous message from some silly third party, offering 3 trivia alerts a week for just $9.99 per month, followed by the standard “Reply STOP to Cancel” message that I’ve seen a hundred times. Though I am quite a trivia buff, the thought of spending $10 a month for 12 tidbits of trivia seemed outrageous. I immediately replied with my “STOP” message and considered following up with “DAMMIT!” but managed to restrain myself.

Then something ominous occurred to me. My head started filling up with “what ifs?”

What if this was a scam?

What if my phone had just been hacked somehow?

What if I replied incorrectly?

After all, the text actually said “Reply STOP to Can For Help call 18888906150.” Did I just get tricked into accepting their service? After about an hour on Google, I had determined that there was a pretty good likelihood that I had.

Next step – call my cell carrier. I called ATT Mobile and spoke with a very pleasant young woman who assured me that she could help me with this. After accessing my account, she confirmed my suspicion . . . I had indeed been scammed. No wait, she didn’t say “scammed,” she said “crammed.” I asked if there was a difference. She said that their term for this is “cramming.” Again I pressed for an explanation as to the difference between a “cram” and a “scam.” All I could get out of her was that this is different because it is done by 3rd party vendors. Huh?

“So, cramming,” I asked, “is it ever legitimate?” “Well . . . . no,” she replied. “Why then, don’t you just block it all?” The conversation quickly went downhill from there. She told me that they can’t block “crammers” and that they have no control over them and how this has even happened to her personally. Somehow that didn’t make me feel any better.

So, the wheels were really turning now. I asked for an explanation for why they would approve of fraudulent activity on their network – back to the cycle of non-answers;

ATT:    “Again, Mr. Peterson, we don’t consider these scammers, some of them provide legitimate services.”

ME:     “Like what? . . . wait . . . so, I wasn’t scammed? You already admitted that this is NEVER legitimate!”

ATT:    “Sir, I have told you that we will take this charge off of your bill.”

ME:     “If I hadn’t caught this, ATT would be collecting the money for this, right?”

ATT:    “Well, yes, it gets billed on your account.”

ME:     “And I pay YOU for this ‘cramming?’”

ATT:    “Sir, I have already credited your account for the charges.” “Is there anything else I can help you with tonight?

I was just getting warmed up . . .

ME:     “Yes there is. Could you tell me how much ATT gets from these charges?”

ATT:    “Sir, I told you. We are refunding your money, so we don’t keep anything.”

ME:     “How about the person who doesn’t catch this in time and pays his bill?”

ATT:    “Then we pay the 3rd party provider.”

ME:     “So, are you telling me that you have a contractual arrangement with them?”      

ATT:    “Well yes, they bill for the services they provide on our phones and we in turn pass through the payment to them.”

ME:     “You said you had no control over them. In fact, you are complicit in this rip-off!”

(the sound of dictionary pages rustling)

ME:     “If you are the entity collecting the money from this admittedly fraudulent scheme, why don’t you just refuse to pay them?”

ME:     “How much does ATT keep from each $9.99 that you collect?”

ATT:    “Sir, you should now have received am email from ATT, stating that the charges have been removed from your account. It may take 24 hours or more for the actual charges to appear, but the credit has already been issued.”

ME:     “Why don’t you just block THIS 3rd party from doing business on YOUR network? We both know for a fact that they are running a scam.”

ATT:    “We are working with the FCC to try and change this.”

ME:     “Does that mean that you are being investigated by the FCC for fraudulent activity?”

ATT:    “I can also put a block on all 3rd party content providers for you, Free of charge.”

ME:     “Why isn’t blocking them the default and then you can let your customers opt in to ‘cramming’ if they want it?”

ATT:    “You will also receive a PIN by text that will allow you to actually make a purchase if you choose to in the future.”

ME:     “Like another scam?”

I was clearly losing her now . . .

ATT:    “Is there anything else I can help you with tonight, Mr. Peterson?”

ME:     “No thank you, you have been very helpful. I’ll be sure to let everyone I know in on this little secret that you have. You have given me lots of good material for my blog on this subject.”

ATT:    “Have a good evening, Mr. Peterson.”

I will hand it to her, she maintained a cool head through this grilling (which lasted 26 minutes with hold time). So, here’s the deal . . .

LESSONS LEARNED

  • Your cell service provider IS NOT on your side (I hope you already knew this)
  • You can be “crammed” without ever signing up for anything
  • Texting “STOP” to these crooks does not mean that you don’t already have charges on your bill
  • Some “crammers” start charging you only IF you reply, regardless of WHAT you reply

ACTION TO TAKE – NOW!

  • Contact your cell service provider TODAY by phone
  • Ask them to block all 3rd party content (this does not prevent you from purchasing apps)
  • Have them check for any unauthorized billing on your current activity
  • Check your statement EVERY month, better yet, twice a month
  • Don’t reply to questionable texts

You are particularly susceptible to being “crammed” if you are set up on auto-pay for your cell service. Some crammers will only charge $2-4/month and hope that you don’t notice. As long as there are people, there will be people who will try to take advantage of others. This is one crook that you can stop. But you can just bet that they are already working on their next scam . . .